Garland vs Inglis 2:0: result and our tips
·
Our tips
Tips and chances as published: . A published tip never changes.
Where the number comes from: chance from the market; the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Inglis: 9 matches in a row under 22.5 games; Under 22.5 games in recent matches: Garland 15 of 20, Inglis 14 of 20 (tour average 62%)
Other tips
- Total Sets: Under 2.5Won62%
Where the number comes from: chance from the market; the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Inglis: 9 matches in a row without a deciding set; No third set in recent matches: Garland 16 of 20, Inglis 15 of 20 (tour average 66%)
Match chances
Winner chance from the market (no margin). The other markets come from the history of matches with a similar balance of strength. Chances and profiles as they stood before the match.
Winner
Elo: J. Garland 48% · M. Inglis 53%
from the market (no margin)
Set score
First set
Total games
The 21.5 line offered by bookmakers before the match: our chance on that line, and next to it the market's (from the odds, without the margin).
Expected total: 22.6
| Line | Over | Under | Tour over |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18.5 | 69% | 31% | 64% |
| 19.5 | 61% | 39% | 56% |
| 20.5 | 55% | 45% | 49% |
| 21.5 | 49% | 51% | 44% |
| 22.5 | 43% | 57% | 38% |
| 23.5 | 39% | 61% | 34% |
| 24.5 | 37% | 64% | 32% |
Sample: 2,405 matches
Games handicap
Tie-break in the match
tour average 22%
How the forecast did
- Favouritefavourite lost
- Most likely set scorewas 2:0
- Total games Under 21.5in · 16 games
- Games handicapnot covered
- Tie-breakno tie-break
Match stats
| Joanna Garland | Maddison Inglis | |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Aces | 3 |
| 4 | Double faults | 1 |
| 56% | First serves in | 63% |
| 69% | First-serve points won | 56% |
| 61% | Second-serve points won | 24% |
| 5/13 | Break points converted | 1/4 |
| 7/8 | Service games held | 3/8 |
| 65% | Service points won | 44% |
| 56% | Return points won | 35% |
| 72 | Total points won | 48 |
Serve profile (12 months)
Matches with stats from the last 12 months, pulled towards the tour average on a small sample.
| J. Garland | Tour | M. Inglis | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service points won | 61% | 56% | 59% |
| Return points won | 40% | 44% | 41% |
| Service games held | 71% | 63% | 69% |
| Breaks of serve | 30% | 37% | 30% |
| Aces per service game | 0.32 | 0.19 | |
| Double faults per game | 0.34 | 0.27 | |
| Sets with a tie-break | 12% | 14% | |
| Tie-breaks won | 4/7 | 5/10 | |
| Wins in straight sets | 63% | 59% | |
| Matches in the sample | 27 | 31 |
Form
The last 10 matches in all tournaments, newest first.
Joanna Garland
- 24/09/26LXinyu Wang#39WTA Singapore · R165:7 4:6
- 21/09/26WStorm Hunter#146WTA Singapore · R326:3 5:7 6:1
- 20/09/26WViktoria Morvayova#274WTA Singapore · Q26:4 6:3
- 19/09/26WEllen PerezWTA Singapore · Q16:1 6:2
- 28/08/26LFrancesca Jones#98WTA US Open · Q34:6 1:6
- 26/08/26WPriscilla Hon#291WTA US Open · Q26:3 6:4
- 25/08/26WLeyre Romero Gormaz#131WTA US Open · Q14:6 6:4 7:5
- 24/06/26LTyra Caterina Grant#154WTA Wimbledon · Q24:6 4:6
- 23/06/26WCeline Naef#212WTA Wimbledon · Q13:6 7:5 6:4
- 07/06/26LRobin Montgomery#150WTA S-Hertogenbosch · Q26:7 3:6
Maddison Inglis
- 18/10/26LClaire Liu#109WTA Osaka · Q24:6 3:6
- 17/10/26WSara Sorribes Tormo#167WTA Osaka · Q17:5 6:4
- 02/10/26LSara Bejlek#32WTA Beijing · R643:6 5:7
- 30/09/26WZeynep Sonmez#64WTA Beijing · R1286:4 6:4
- 29/09/26WDarya Astakhova#176WTA Beijing · Q26:2 7:5
- 28/09/26WXinxin Yao#268WTA Beijing · Q16:1 7:5
- 25/08/26LStorm Hunter#146WTA US Open · Q13:6 0:6
- 01/08/26LTaylah Preston#85WTA 125 Vancouver · F6:7 3:6
- 31/07/26WMai Hontama#163WTA 125 Vancouver · SF6:3 6:4
- 30/07/26WMoyuka Uchijima#121WTA 125 Vancouver · QF6:4 6:7 6:3
Elo over the last year
Record by surface (12 months)
Wins–losses over the last 12 months.
| J. Garland | M. Inglis | |
|---|---|---|
| Hard court | 14–767% | 15–963% |
| Clay | 0–10% | 0–20% |
| Grass | 2–340% | 2–340% |
Head to head
They have not met yet.