Nagal vs Rocha 2:1: result and our tips
·
Our tips
Tips and chances as published: . A published tip never changes.
Where the number comes from: chance from the market; the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Nagal: 10 matches in a row under 23.5 games
Other tips
- Total Sets: Under 2.5Lost66%
Where the number comes from: chance from the market; the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Nagal: 10 matches in a row without a deciding set
- Match Winner: RochaLost76%
Where the number comes from: chance from the market (bookmakers 76%); the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Rocha: 4 wins in a row; Rocha won 7 of the last 10 matches
Match chances
Winner chance from the market (no margin). The other markets come from the history of matches with a similar balance of strength. Chances and profiles as they stood before the match.
Winner
Elo: S. Nagal 35% · H. Rocha 66%
from the market (no margin)
Set score
First set
Total games
The 20.5 line offered by bookmakers before the match: our chance on that line, and next to it the market's (from the odds, without the margin).
Expected total: 22.1
| Line | Over | Under | Tour over |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17.5 | 76% | 24% | 76% |
| 18.5 | 67% | 33% | 68% |
| 19.5 | 58% | 42% | 59% |
| 20.5 | 51% | 49% | 52% |
| 21.5 | 46% | 54% | 47% |
| 22.5 | 40% | 60% | 40% |
| 23.5 | 36% | 64% | 36% |
Sample: 3,092 matches
Games handicap
Tie-break in the match
tour average 27%
How the forecast did
- Favouritefavourite lost
- Most likely set scorewas 2:1
- Total games Over 20.5in · 34 games
- Games handicapnot covered
- Tie-breaktie-break played
Match stats
| Sumit Nagal | Henrique Rocha | |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Aces | 3 |
| 2 | Double faults | 1 |
| 81% | First serves in | 81% |
| 60% | First-serve points won | 63% |
| 50% | Second-serve points won | 58% |
| 4/9 | Break points converted | 4/4 |
| 12/16 | Service games held | 13/17 |
| 58% | Service points won | 62% |
| 38% | Return points won | 42% |
| 100 | Total points won | 107 |
Serve profile (12 months)
Matches with stats from the last 12 months, pulled towards the tour average on a small sample.
| S. Nagal | Tour | H. Rocha | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service points won | 60% | 62% | 63% |
| Return points won | 40% | 38% | 40% |
| Service games held | 73% | 76% | 78% |
| Breaks of serve | 28% | 24% | 28% |
| Aces per service game | 0.17 | 0.28 | |
| Double faults per game | 0.23 | 0.28 | |
| Sets with a tie-break | 11% | 17% | |
| Tie-breaks won | 4/12 | 15/26 | |
| Wins in straight sets | 64% | 73% | |
| Matches in the sample | 45 | 67 |
Form
The last 10 matches in all tournaments, newest first.
Sumit Nagal
- 06/10/26LLuka Mikrut#167Challenger Braga · R322:6 4:6
- 25/08/26LArthur Gea#56ATP US Open · Q13:6 6:7
- 19/08/26LJan Kumstat#191Challenger Prague · R165:7 3:6
- 17/08/26WEduardo Ribeiro#346Challenger Prague · R327:6 6:4
- 11/08/26LMax Houkes#226Challenger Hamburg · R325:7 2:6
- 01/08/26LJan Kumstat#191Challenger Liberec · SF5:7 4:6
- 31/07/26WMartin Krumich#257Challenger Liberec · QF6:3 6:2
- 29/07/26WPetr Brunclik#359Challenger Liberec · R166:4 6:4
- 27/07/26WInaki Montes-de la Torre#175Challenger Liberec · R326:3 6:3
- 21/07/26LAndrej Nedic#244Challenger Tampere · R321:6 6:7
Henrique Rocha
- 04/10/26WInaki Montes-de la Torre#175Challenger Porto 2 · F2:6 6:4 6:4
- 02/10/26WAugust Holmgren#236Challenger Porto 2 · QF6:3 7:6
- 01/10/26WMili Poljicak#286Challenger Porto 2 · R166:2 6:0
- 29/09/26WCezar Cretu#276Challenger Porto 2 · R327:5 6:3
- 11/09/26LDusan Lajovic#148Challenger Seville · QF4:6 4:6
- 10/09/26WSantiago Rodriguez Taverna#460Challenger Seville · R166:4 6:1
- 08/09/26WCarlos Taberner#361Challenger Seville · R326:3 7:6
- 26/08/26LLloyd Harris#110ATP US Open · Q26:2 2:6 6:7
- 25/08/26WMichael Mmoh#151ATP US Open · Q17:5 6:4
- 20/08/26LHubert Hurkacz#34Challenger Cancun · R162:6 6:4 4:6
Elo over the last year
Record by surface (12 months)
Wins–losses over the last 12 months.
| S. Nagal | H. Rocha | |
|---|---|---|
| Hard court | 5–645% | 14–1156% |
| Clay | 17–1750% | 25–1366% |
| Grass | 0–0 | 1–325% |
Head to head
They have not met yet.