Piros vs Djere 0:2: result and our tips
·
Our tips
Tips and chances as published: . A published tip never changes.
Where the number comes from: chance from the market; the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Djere: 8 matches in a row under 23.5 games; Under 23.5 games in recent matches: Piros 14 of 20, Djere 15 of 20 (tour average 63%)
Other tips
- Total Sets: Under 2.5Won62%
Where the number comes from: chance from the market; the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Djere: 8 matches in a row without a deciding set
Where the number comes from: chance from the market; the pick and the reasoning come from our data
Djere: 4 matches in a row under 21.5 games
Match chances
Winner chance from the market (no margin). The other markets come from the history of matches with a similar balance of strength. Chances and profiles as they stood before the match.
Winner
Elo: Z. Piros 54% · L. Djere 46%
from the market (no margin)
Set score
First set
Total games
The 22.5 line offered by bookmakers before the match: our chance on that line, and next to it the market's (from the odds, without the margin).
Expected total: 23.4
| Line | Over | Under | Tour over |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19.5 | 68% | 32% | 62% |
| 20.5 | 59% | 41% | 54% |
| 21.5 | 54% | 46% | 49% |
| 22.5 | 47% | 53% | 42% |
| 23.5 | 42% | 58% | 37% |
| 24.5 | 40% | 60% | 35% |
| 25.5 | 36% | 64% | 32% |
Sample: 5,256 matches
Games handicap
Tie-break in the match
tour average 32%
How the forecast did
- Favouritefavourite lost
- Most likely set scorewas 0:2
- Total games Under 22.5in · 18 games
- Games handicapnot covered
- Tie-breakno tie-break
Match stats
| Zsombor Piros | Laslo Djere | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Aces | 8 |
| 1 | Double faults | 0 |
| 73% | First serves in | 67% |
| 63% | First-serve points won | 93% |
| 50% | Second-serve points won | 64% |
| 0/0 | Break points converted | 3/4 |
| 6/9 | Service games held | 9/9 |
| 60% | Service points won | 84% |
| 16% | Return points won | 40% |
| 38 | Total points won | 57 |
Serve profile (12 months)
Matches with stats from the last 12 months, pulled towards the tour average on a small sample.
| Z. Piros | Tour | L. Djere | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service points won | 63% | 62% | 64% |
| Return points won | 40% | 38% | 40% |
| Service games held | 80% | 76% | 79% |
| Breaks of serve | 29% | 24% | 26% |
| Aces per service game | 0.35 | 0.33 | |
| Double faults per game | 0.20 | 0.22 | |
| Sets with a tie-break | 12% | 18% | |
| Tie-breaks won | 12/18 | 11/23 | |
| Wins in straight sets | 63% | 74% | |
| Matches in the sample | 66 | 55 |
Form
The last 10 matches in all tournaments, newest first.
Zsombor Piros
- 18/10/26LFrancesco Passaro#153Challenger Maia · F6:4 3:6 2:6
- 17/10/26WAlejo Sanchez Quilez#326Challenger Maia · SF6:4 6:4
- 16/10/26WLorenzo Giustino#229Challenger Maia · QF6:3 1:6 7:6
- 14/10/26WPol Martin Tiffon#209Challenger Maia · R166:3 6:2
- 13/10/26WBenjamin Hassan#465Challenger Maia · R326:3 6:2
- 08/10/26LElmer Moller#150Challenger Braga · R166:1 1:6 5:7
- 05/10/26WTristan Boyer#195Challenger Braga · R326:2 5:7 6:4
- 30/09/26LEnrico Dalla Valle#304Challenger Bari · R164:6 2:6
- 28/09/26WBenjamin Hassan#465Challenger Bari · R327:6 6:3
- 01/09/26LMattia Bellucci#66ATP US Open · R1284:6 2:6 0:6
Laslo Djere
- 13/10/26LMichael Mmoh#147Challenger Olbia · R324:6 3:6
- 11/10/26WDaniil Glinka#157Challenger Villena · F6:4 6:4
- 10/10/26WPedro Martinez#126Challenger Villena · SF6:4 6:2
- 09/10/26WHynek Barton#275Challenger Villena · QF6:3 7:5
- 08/10/26WOliver Tarvet#295Challenger Villena · R166:4 7:6
- 07/10/26WDominic Stricker#253Challenger Villena · R326:1 7:5
- 01/10/26LDaniel Rincon#232Challenger Porto 2 · R166:7 4:6
- 28/09/26WMichael Mmoh#147Challenger Porto 2 · R326:4 6:4
- 16/09/26LLuka Mikrut#247Challenger Szczecin · R163:6 2:2
- 15/09/26WJohan Nikles#418Challenger Szczecin · R326:7 6:3 6:0
Elo over the last year
Record by surface (12 months)
Wins–losses over the last 12 months.
| Z. Piros | L. Djere | |
|---|---|---|
| Hard court | 12–475% | 11–955% |
| Clay | 33–1569% | 22–1167% |
| Grass | 1–150% | 1–150% |
Head to head
They have not met yet.